A Resolution Calculus for First-order Schemata

نویسندگان

  • Vincent Aravantinos
  • Mnacho Echenim
  • Nicolas Peltier
چکیده

We devise a resolution calculus that tests the satisfiability of infinite families of clause sets, called clause set schemata. For schemata of propositional clause sets, we prove that this calculus is sound, refutationally complete, and terminating. The calculus is extended to first-order clauses, for which termination is lost, since the satisfiability problem is not semi-decidable for nonpropositional schemata. The expressive power of the considered logic is strictly greater than the one considered in our previous work.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

CERES in Propositional Proof Schemata

Cut-elimination is one of the most famous problems in proof theory, and it was defined and solved for first-order sequent calculus by Gentzen in his celebrated Hauptsatz. Ceres is a different cut-elimination algorithm for firstand higher-order classical logic. It is based on the notion of a characteristic set of clauses which is extracted from a proof in sequent calculus and is always unsatisfi...

متن کامل

CERES for First-Order Schemata

The cut-elimination method CERES (for firstand higherorder classical logic) is based on the notion of a characteristic clause set, which is extracted from an LK-proof and is always unsatisfiable. A resolution refutation of this clause set can be used as a skeleton for a proof with atomic cuts only (atomic cut normal form). This is achieved by replacing clauses from the resolution refutation by ...

متن کامل

Clausal Analysis of First-order Proof Schemata

Proof schemata are a variant of LK-proofs able to simulate various induction schemes in first-order logic by adding so called proof links to the standard first-order LK-calculus. Proof links allow proofs to reference proofs thus giving proof schemata a recursive structure. Unfortunately, applying reductive cutelimination is non-trivial in the presence of proof links. Borrowing the concept of la...

متن کامل

A paramodulation-based calculus for refuting schemata of clause sets defined by rewrite rules

We devise a calculus based on the resolution and paramodulation rules and operating on schemata of formulæ. These schemata are de ned inductively, using convergent rewrite systems encoding primitive recursive de nitions. The main original feature of this calculus is that the rules operate on formulæ or terms occurring at arbitrary deep positions inside the considered schemata, thus a ecting the...

متن کامل

A Resolution Calculus for Recursive Clause Sets [Preprint]

Proof schemata provide an alternative formalism for proofs containing an inductive argument, which allow an extension of Herbrand’s theorem and thus, the construction of Herbrand sequents and expansion trees. Existing proof transformation methods for proof schemata rely on constructing a recursive resolution refutation, a task which is highly non-trivial. An automated method for constructing su...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Fundam. Inform.

دوره 125  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2013